Tag Archives: California Lemon Law

Jeep Wrangler 4XE Plug-In Hybrid Repeated Problems

Posted on by

Jeep Wrangler 4XE The Jeep Wrangler 4XE plug-in hybrid has faced a series of challenges that have left many owners questioning the reliability of their vehicles. Reports from owners highlight a range of issues, from stalling engines that cannot be restarted to transmission errors, battery defects, and more serious safety concerns.

One common complaint among Wrangler 4XE owners is the vehicle’s tendency to stall unexpectedly, leaving drivers unable to restart the car. This issue is not just inconvenient but poses a significant safety risk, especially if it occurs in traffic or remote areas. Additionally, there have been reports of defective batteries and blown fuses, further contributing to the vehicle’s unreliability.

Transmission problems are another significant issue, with some owners experiencing leaks and errors, alongside instances where the shifter becomes stuck in park, rendering the vehicle immobile. Warning lights, such as the check engine light and power steering light, frequently accompany these mechanical failures, along with messages indicating the need to “Service Electronic Stability.”

Charging issues have also been a point of frustration. Errors like “Service Charging System” have been reported, alongside malfunctions in the Power Inverter Module (PIM), further complicating the ownership experience. In some cases, these electrical issues lead to a complete loss of power, preventing the vehicle from starting.

More alarming are reports of oil leaks from the exhaust and rear undercarriage, with one vehicle diagnosed with a bad pinion seal on the rear axle at merely 241 miles on the odometer. The recurrence of such leaks, accompanied by smoke and the potential risk of fire, underscores the severity of the Wrangler 4XE’s problems.

The erratic behavior of the vehicle’s transmission and propulsion systems, including sudden stops in the middle of highways and unintended acceleration that has led to property damage, raises significant concerns about the safety and reliability of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE.

For owners facing these daunting issues, California’s Lemon Law provides a beacon of hope. This law is designed to protect consumers who have purchased or leased new vehicles covered by a manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty. If a vehicle proves to be defective and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer is required to either replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price to the consumer.

Under the California Lemon Law, owners of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE experiencing repeated failures that substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety may be entitled to relief. It’s essential for affected owners to keep detailed records of all repairs and attempts made to address the issues, as these documents will be crucial in pursuing a lemon law claim.

The myriad of problems faced by Jeep Wrangler 4XE owners highlights the challenges in the automotive industry’s shift towards electrification, especially in models that are expected to perform under the demanding conditions for which Jeeps are renowned. For those grappling with these defects, understanding and utilizing the protections offered by the Lemon Law can provide a pathway to resolution and ensure that manufacturers are held accountable for the reliability and safety of their vehicles.

Things You Should Know About Vehicles With Rebuilt Titles

Posted on by

Automobile Rebuild Tites

Vehicles with rebuilt titles in the United States represent a unique category in the automotive market. Understanding what a rebuilt title is, its implications, and the pros and cons of purchasing such vehicles is crucial for any potential buyer or current owner.

What is a Rebuilt Title?

A rebuilt title is assigned to a vehicle that was previously deemed a total loss by an insurance company due to extensive damage or theft and then repaired to a roadworthy condition. This title indicates that the vehicle has been restored after significant damage.

How a Vehicle Gets a Rebuilt Title

  1. Damage and Insurance Assessment: Initially, a vehicle is given a salvage title when it’s considered a total loss by an insurance company, typically due to severe damage, flood, fire, or theft.
  2. Repair and Restoration: The vehicle is then repaired, often by a private individual or a repair facility.
  3. Inspection: After repairs, the vehicle undergoes a state-mandated inspection to ensure it meets safety standards.
  4. Rebranding as Rebuilt: Once it passes inspection, the vehicle’s title is rebranded from salvage to rebuilt.

Identifying a Vehicle with a Rebuilt Title

The title document itself will clearly state if it is a rebuilt title. Additionally, vehicle history report services can provide this information based on the vehicle identification number (VIN).

Impact on Automobile Insurance

  • Limited Insurance Options: Many insurers are hesitant to cover rebuilt title cars or offer limited policies excluding collision and comprehensive coverage.
  • Higher Premiums: Those that do offer full coverage might charge significantly higher premiums due to the perceived higher risk.

Pros and Cons of Buying a Rebuilt Title Vehicle

Pros

  1. Documented Repair Work: Sellers of rebuilt title cars often provide detailed documentation of repairs, offering more insight into the vehicle’s condition than typical used car transactions.
  2. Significant Discounts: These vehicles are generally much cheaper, with potential discounts up to 50% compared to cars with clean titles.

Cons

  1. Safety Risks: There’s an inherent risk in the vehicle’s safety standards, as the extent and quality of repairs can vary.
  2. Limited Insurance Coverage: Difficulty in securing comprehensive insurance coverage is a significant drawback.
  3. Financing Challenges: Most major banks are reluctant to finance vehicles with rebuilt titles.
  4. Voided Warranty: Manufacturer warranties are typically voided once a vehicle is marked as salvage or rebuilt.
  5. Low Resale Value: These vehicles have a lower resale value and may be challenging to sell, as some dealerships avoid buying them.

Owning a vehicle with a rebuilt title can significantly impact the applicability and process of invoking the California Lemon Law. This law is designed to protect consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles with substantial manufacturing defects. However, when it comes to vehicles with rebuilt titles, the situation becomes more complex. Typically, these vehicles are excluded from coverage under the California Lemon Law because they are not new and have been extensively repaired after being deemed a total loss. The law primarily covers vehicles under the original manufacturer’s warranty, which is often voided in the case of a rebuilt title. Additionally, the history of significant damage and subsequent repairs makes it challenging to attribute any new defects directly to the manufacturer’s responsibility, a key criterion under the Lemon Law. As a result, owners of vehicles with rebuilt titles may find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to seek remedy under this law for any issues that arise with their vehicle.

Vehicles with rebuilt titles present a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges. While they offer an affordable option with potentially well-documented repair histories, the drawbacks in terms of safety, insurance, financing, warranty, and resale value are significant. It’s essential for buyers to weigh these factors carefully, conduct thorough research, and consider their willingness to accept the risks associated with a rebuilt title vehicle.

The California Lemon Law: Empowering Consumers to Tackle Defective Vehicles

Posted on by

Purchasing a new vehicle is an exciting milestone for many individuals. However, when faced with the unfortunate reality of a defective car, the California Lemon Law comes to the rescue. Designed to protect consumers’ rights, this legislation provides a robust framework to address the complexities of modern vehicles, including the rising significance of software updates in resolving recalls. In this article, we will delve into the essence of the California Lemon Law and how it empowers individuals to overcome the challenges posed by defective vehicles in today’s technologically advanced era.

The Evolution of Vehicle Complexity:

As technology rapidly evolves, so does the complexity of modern vehicles. With advanced computer systems, integrated electronics, and intricate mechanical components, diagnosing and resolving defects has become increasingly intricate. The California Lemon Law recognizes this evolving landscape and ensures that consumers have adequate recourse when faced with persistent vehicle problems that impair its safety, value, or utility.

Understanding the California Lemon Law:

The California Lemon Law, formally known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, grants significant rights and protections to individuals who purchase or lease new vehicles that turn out to be defective. Under this law, consumers are entitled to a refund, replacement, or cash compensation if the vehicle experiences substantial defects within a specified period, typically during the first 18 months or 18,000 miles of use.

Key Provisions of the California Lemon Law:

1. The Number of Repair Attempts: If a vehicle’s manufacturer or authorized dealer fails to repair the same defect after a reasonable number of attempts, the consumer may be eligible for relief under the Lemon Law. The law presumes that a “reasonable number of attempts” is two for a serious safety defect, or four or more for a non-safety defect that substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, value, or safety.

2. The Manufacturer’s Opportunity to Repair: Before taking legal action, the consumer must provide the manufacturer or dealer an opportunity to repair the defect(s) under the terms of the warranty. It is crucial to document all repair attempts and maintain a comprehensive record of communication with the manufacturer or dealer.

Recalls and Software Updates:

With the increasing reliance on software in modern vehicles, software-related defects have become a significant concern. Many recalls nowadays are rectified through software updates, which can address various performance or safety issues. The California Lemon Law acknowledges the importance of software updates as a corrective measure for recalls and requires manufacturers to provide timely and effective remedies for such defects.

It is worth noting that the Lemon Law’s provisions apply equally to software-related defects, and consumers have the same rights and protections in these cases. If a software update fails to rectify a defect within a reasonable number of attempts, consumers may still seek relief under the law.

The California Lemon Law plays a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of consumers faced with defective vehicles in an era of increasing complexity. By providing clear guidelines and recourse options, this legislation empowers individuals to hold manufacturers accountable for persistent defects that undermine the safety, value, or utility of their vehicles. With a nuanced understanding of the California Lemon Law, consumers can navigate the process effectively and seek the remedies they deserve, including recourse for software-related defects.

2014 Tesla Model S Lemon Law Buyback

Posted on by

Our client bought a 2014 Tesla Model S and was thrilled.

Their first visit for servicing was on December 7, 2017. There was a 12 volt alert present. The headlights were aimed too high and would not adjust. The windshield washer jets were misaligned. The firmware was not installing. The A/C was not working. The vehicle would not charge with the customer’s cable. The vehicle was pulling slightly to the right. Car uses more energy on short drives than the range estimates.

The next visit was on December 11th as the floor mats were folding over.

The Tesla was brought in again on March 8, 2018 because the universal mobile connector would not light up and the vehicle would not charge. Key FOB is not recognized when inside the vehicle. The charge port door will not open with touchscreen or charge cable. The exterior door handle is poorly aligned.

April 10th the vehicle was back for servicing because there was no sound coming from the speakers. There was a problem with the windows not rolling up all the way.

It was back for service on April 24th because the charge port was not functioning.

September 6th it was back for servicing due to the fact that the charge port door would not stay closed and the light does not illuminate when charging. Per bulletin need to replace the bolts in steering rack housing. There was a humming sound coming from the front of the vehicle.

The next visit was on September 17th because the humming sound was still coming from the front of the vehicle. When the parking sensor was pushed in there was a problem. The alert was on for car needs service and the steering assist was reduced. The charge port door magnet was detached from the charge port.

The last visit was on December 10th as the vehicle was towed in for “power reduced” alert.

At this point our client was frustrated and contacted our firm to see what the attorney thought about his Tesla being a lemon.

We filed a demand letter with Tesla that they repurchase his defective vehicle under the California Lemon Law. They agreed to repurchase the vehicle, pay off the balance, reimburse him for any down payment and payments made, pay off the balance less a mileage fee allowed under the California Lemon Law.

Our client was very happy with the buyback of his vehicle. If you think you might be driving a lemon please contact The Law Office of Barry L. Edzant at 888-395-3666 for a free consultation.

2013 Ford Fiesta Ca Lemon Law Buyback

Posted on by

The owner of a 2013 Ford Fiesta contacted the Law Offices Of Delsack & Associates P.C. after repeated complaints and three (3) repair attempts at her Ford dealer. She told us she suspected her transmission was defective as it would slip, shudder and hesitate while driving and she questioned whether her vehicle was eligible for a buyback under the California Lemon Law. After analyzing her case by reviewing the repair orders and purchase contract, we determined that she had a valid claim to have the vehicle repurchased.

A short time after filing our demand, Ford agreed to buy back the 2013 Fiesta. They paid our clients purchase balance, reimburse her down payment and monthly payments, and paid her attorney’s fees. Ford was allowed to deduct a usage fee as allowed under the California Lemon Law.

Our client was thrilled to get rid of her dangerous vehicle and be reimbursed for the monies she had paid.

Defective 2014 Fiat 500L – CA Lemon Law Buyback

Posted on by

Shortly after purchasing a 2014 Fiat 500L in June 2014, the owner was returning to her dealership with car problems. She subsequently provided FCA eight (8) more repair opportunities that kept her vehicle out of service for over 90 days. When she contacted the Law Offices of Delsack & Associates, P.C. she told us her vehicle had numerous problems which included:

  • The transmission, electrical and ignition system were defective;
  • Both the body control module and power train control module had been replaced;
  • The check engine light always remained on;
  • There was a burning smell from the engine;
  • The vehicle had been recalled for a drivers side knee airbags that may not deploy properly; and
  • The vehicle had been recalled for a transmission that was slow to shift or wouldn’t shift at all.

After trying unsuccessfully to have these defects repaired until March 28, 2016 , our client retained us to represent her in her demand for a buyback. Within a short time our firm was able to negotiate a repurchase of the defective vehicle. Our client was reimbursed for her down payment, monthly payments, and registration. FCA additionally paid her purchase balance in full and her attorney’s fees. The manufacturer was allowed to deduct a usage fee as allowed under the California Lemon Law, but the amount was minimal. Our client was thrilled with the outcome and happy to be rid of her defective Fiat 500L.

Ford & Lincoln Vehicles Affected By Airbag Problem

Posted on by

Ford is issuing a safety compliance recall for approximately 32,000 2016-2017 Ford Edge, 2016-2017 Lincoln MKX and 2017 Lincoln Continental vehicles to replace Takata driver frontal airbag modules. According to the recall report, the affected vehicles have airbags that may not completely fill or the airbag cushion could detach during deployment. This problem is not related to Takata’s recall for airbags that can experience propellant degradation resulting in a potential rupture, but the results can be just as dangerous.

Owners will be asked to return to their dealer to have the driver frontal air bag module replaced. Because parts are not currently available safety recall will be sent out in March 2017 and a second notice will be sent when parts are available. For more information about the problem owners are asked to contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford’s number for this recall is 17C02 and the NHTSA campaign number is 17V-123.

2015 Jeep Wrangler California Lemon Law Buyback

Posted on by

The Law Offices of Delsack & Associates recently helped the owner of a 2015 Jeep Wrangler obtain a buyback from Fiat Chrysler, after she started experiencing problems affecting the engine and cooling system. The vehicle had two (2) unsuccessful repair attempts and was out of service for over 30 days when she decided to contact us for advice. She told us she repeatedly complained to the dealership about the problems, but the Wrangler was still not repaired. Continue reading →