Things You Should Know About Vehicles With Rebuilt Titles

Posted on by

Automobile Rebuild Tites

Vehicles with rebuilt titles in the United States represent a unique category in the automotive market. Understanding what a rebuilt title is, its implications, and the pros and cons of purchasing such vehicles is crucial for any potential buyer or current owner.

What is a Rebuilt Title?

A rebuilt title is assigned to a vehicle that was previously deemed a total loss by an insurance company due to extensive damage or theft and then repaired to a roadworthy condition. This title indicates that the vehicle has been restored after significant damage.

How a Vehicle Gets a Rebuilt Title

  1. Damage and Insurance Assessment: Initially, a vehicle is given a salvage title when it’s considered a total loss by an insurance company, typically due to severe damage, flood, fire, or theft.
  2. Repair and Restoration: The vehicle is then repaired, often by a private individual or a repair facility.
  3. Inspection: After repairs, the vehicle undergoes a state-mandated inspection to ensure it meets safety standards.
  4. Rebranding as Rebuilt: Once it passes inspection, the vehicle’s title is rebranded from salvage to rebuilt.

Identifying a Vehicle with a Rebuilt Title

The title document itself will clearly state if it is a rebuilt title. Additionally, vehicle history report services can provide this information based on the vehicle identification number (VIN).

Impact on Automobile Insurance

  • Limited Insurance Options: Many insurers are hesitant to cover rebuilt title cars or offer limited policies excluding collision and comprehensive coverage.
  • Higher Premiums: Those that do offer full coverage might charge significantly higher premiums due to the perceived higher risk.

Pros and Cons of Buying a Rebuilt Title Vehicle

Pros

  1. Documented Repair Work: Sellers of rebuilt title cars often provide detailed documentation of repairs, offering more insight into the vehicle’s condition than typical used car transactions.
  2. Significant Discounts: These vehicles are generally much cheaper, with potential discounts up to 50% compared to cars with clean titles.

Cons

  1. Safety Risks: There’s an inherent risk in the vehicle’s safety standards, as the extent and quality of repairs can vary.
  2. Limited Insurance Coverage: Difficulty in securing comprehensive insurance coverage is a significant drawback.
  3. Financing Challenges: Most major banks are reluctant to finance vehicles with rebuilt titles.
  4. Voided Warranty: Manufacturer warranties are typically voided once a vehicle is marked as salvage or rebuilt.
  5. Low Resale Value: These vehicles have a lower resale value and may be challenging to sell, as some dealerships avoid buying them.

Owning a vehicle with a rebuilt title can significantly impact the applicability and process of invoking the California Lemon Law. This law is designed to protect consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles with substantial manufacturing defects. However, when it comes to vehicles with rebuilt titles, the situation becomes more complex. Typically, these vehicles are excluded from coverage under the California Lemon Law because they are not new and have been extensively repaired after being deemed a total loss. The law primarily covers vehicles under the original manufacturer’s warranty, which is often voided in the case of a rebuilt title. Additionally, the history of significant damage and subsequent repairs makes it challenging to attribute any new defects directly to the manufacturer’s responsibility, a key criterion under the Lemon Law. As a result, owners of vehicles with rebuilt titles may find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to seek remedy under this law for any issues that arise with their vehicle.

Vehicles with rebuilt titles present a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges. While they offer an affordable option with potentially well-documented repair histories, the drawbacks in terms of safety, insurance, financing, warranty, and resale value are significant. It’s essential for buyers to weigh these factors carefully, conduct thorough research, and consider their willingness to accept the risks associated with a rebuilt title vehicle.

Audi E-Tron Quattro Fire Risk From Overheating Battery Modules

Posted on by

The Volkswagen Group of America, operating under its Audi brand, has recently identified a critical issue in a range of its electric vehicle models. This issue revolves around the charging system, specifically the high-voltage battery modules, raising concerns about potential overheating and fire safety risks.

Affected Models

The problem affects several Audi models between 2019 and 2024, including the RS e-tron GT, e-tron GT, Q4 e-tron Sportback, Q4 e-tron, Audi A8, e-tron Quattro, e-tron Sportback Quattro, Q5, and A7.

Overheating High-Voltage Battery Modules

The central issue lies in the high-voltage battery modules, which are prone to overheating. This has been especially evident when charging with the industrial 220V/240V plug at a current of 40 amperes. Crucially, Investigations revealed that the charging equipment itself was not at fault. Instead, the issue often stemmed from household power outlets and wiring incapable of handling the required current, leading to overheating of the home infrastructure.

Initial Discovery and Response

The issue first came to light in April 2020, following a fire incident outside the U.S. Audi collaborated with their high-voltage battery supplier, LG Energy Solutions, to investigate. By mid-2023, a noticeable increase in thermal events led to a deeper examination. Despite a service campaign in April 2022 that included a software update for cell module balancing, issues persisted.

Recall and Remedial Actions

In response, Audi initiated a voluntary global safety recall, designated 93U9 by Audi and 23V-867 by the NHTSA. The recall includes installing onboard diagnostic software to monitor battery module performance and replacing affected modules as necessary. Interim notification letters are scheduled for February 2024, with a detailed follow-up expected in the third quarter of the same year.

Charging Cable Replacement

A significant aspect of the recall is the replacement of the power cable used for industrial sockets (220V/240V/NEMA 14-50). The existing cable (part number 7PP971678 ED) will be replaced with a new design (part number 7PP971678GA), featuring temperature sensors. These cables should be available in the second quarter of 2024.

Safety Concerns and User Guidance

Owners of affected models are advised to be cautious, especially when using industrial sockets for charging. The overheating issue can cause not only damage to the charging cable but also pose a risk to household electrical infrastructure. If the problem exists, users may notice the charging cable feeling hot to the touch after use.

This recall underscores the importance of matching electric vehicle charging systems with compatible household wiring. Audi’s proactive steps in addressing this issue highlight their commitment to customer safety and the integrity of their electric vehicle line. Owners of the affected models are encouraged to heed recall notices and ensure their home charging setups are compatible and safe.

The charging issue identified in Audi’s electric vehicles bears notable similarities to the Chevrolet Bolt recall (21V-650). In both cases, the central concern revolves around the battery systems and the associated risk of overheating, which could potentially lead to fire hazards. The Chevrolet Bolt recall, much like Audi’s, involved issues with high-voltage battery packs that were found to be prone to catching fire. Both recalls necessitated substantial corrective actions, including software updates, close monitoring of battery performance, and in some cases, the replacement of battery modules. Furthermore, these incidents highlight a broader challenge in the electric vehicle industry, emphasizing the need for more robust and safe battery technologies and charging infrastructures. Such parallels underline the growing pains of electric vehicle technology and the critical importance of ensuring safety as these vehicles become increasingly prevalent.

GM “Stop Delivery” On Certain Chevy Blazer, Chevy Equinox And GMC Terrain Vehicles

Posted on by

Chevy Blazer EV Stop Delivery

General Motors (GM) has announced an immediate stop delivery order for certain 2024 model vehicles, including the Chevrolet Blazer, Chevrolet Blazer EV, Chevrolet Equinox, and GMC Terrain vehicles. This decision, taken as a precautionary measure to ensure customer satisfaction and vehicle reliability.

The specific issue prompting this stop delivery order has not been publicly disclosed by General Motors. The order is categorized under “Global Safety Field Investigations,” suggesting that GM is actively working to identify and rectify the underlying problem. The lack of detailed information at this stage highlights the company’s cautious approach in handling potential vehicle issues.

Affected vehicles have been identified through their Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs), with a clear directive that these vehicles should not be sold or delivered by dealers until further details and solutions are provided. This restriction also prohibits dealer trades, auction releases, demonstration uses, or any other dealership activities involving these models. To facilitate this process, GM has updated the Investigate Vehicle History (IVH) screen in the Global Warranty Management (GWM) system, which now tags the affected vehicles with a “Stop Delivery” status and labels the VIN as “Incomplete Remedy Not Available.”

One significant concern that has emerged is related to software issues in the 2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV, which uses GM’s advanced Ultium battery system. A small number of Blazer EV owners have reported issues with the software quality, prompting Chevrolet to temporarily halt sales and deliveries of this model. This pause is intended to ensure that the vehicles delivered meet GM’s high standards for quality and reliability. Notably, the software problems cannot be resolved through an over-the-air (OTA) update, necessitating a visit to the dealership for service.

GM has assured customers and stakeholders that these software issues are not safety-related and do not pertain to the Ultium battery system or the Google Built-in features. The engineering teams at GM are actively working on a solution. Affected vehicle owners will be contacted by GM with instructions on scheduling their software updates.

This stop delivery order, labeled under GM number N232429910, is a measure by GM to preemptively address potential issues before they impact customers. As the situation evolves, GM is expected to provide further updates and guidance to both dealerships and vehicle owners.

Driver Air Bag Could Deactivate In Ford Trucks

Posted on by

Ford Motor Company is reaching out to owners of certain 2023 F-150 and Ford Super Duty vehicles, including the F250, F350, F450, F550, and F600 models. There is a concern with the driver’s frontal air bag not deploying during a crash.

The issue came to light in November 2023, when Ford’s main supplier, BCS Automotive Interface Solutions, alerted them about a potential problem. This was linked to airbag clock springs provided by American Furukawa, a sub-supplier to BCS. BCS discovered that some clock spring assemblies in the Steering Column Control Modules (SCCM) they supplied to Ford might have been tainted during production.

The problem lies in the SCCM of the affected vehicles, where the clock spring assembly might have a weak weld between the bus bar and the ribbon cable. This issue traces back to the manufacturing stage, where clock spring bus bars were washed in isopropyl alcohol mixed with glycerin. This mix could weaken the weld between the bus bar and ribbon cable in the clock spring assembly.

This ribbon cable is crucial as it connects to the driver’s airbag. A weak weld can cause the ribbon cable circuits to disconnect, leading to a loss of electrical connection to the driver’s front airbag. This malfunction would trigger the airbag warning light and prevent the airbag from deploying as needed. Ford, alongside BCS, has been investigating this issue. They’re reviewing production and shipping records to identify which Ford vehicles might be equipped with the affected clock springs.

As of December 6, 2023, Ford received 19 warranty reports dating from May 1 to November 10, 2023, which could be linked to this clock spring issue.

Drivers might notice problems like non-functional steering wheel switches (like radio controls), a silent horn, and an illuminated airbag warning lamp.

Affected owners will be contacted to bring their vehicles to Ford dealers for an inspection and, if necessary, a replacement of the air bag clock spring. Initial notifications to owners explaining the safety risk are planned for January 8, 2024. A follow-up notice will be sent once the replacement parts are ready, expected in the second quarter of 2024. This recall is officially listed under the NHTSA campaign number 23V-847.

OCS Sensors May Short Circuit In Lexus And Toyota Vehicles

Posted on by

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) has announced a significant recall affecting a range of Lexus and Toyota vehicles from the 2020 to 2022 model years. This recall, necessitated by a defect in the Occupant Classification System (OCS) sensor, underscores a critical safety issue that could potentially prevent the deployment of the front passenger airbag.

The recall spans a variety of models, including:

  • Lexus ES (2020-2021)
  • Lexus ES Hybrid (2020-2022)
  • Lexus RX and RX Hybrid (2020-2021)
  • Toyota Avalon and Avalon Hybrid (2020-2021)
  • Toyota Camry and Camry Hybrid (2020-2022)
  • Toyota Corolla, Highlander, and their Hybrid variants (2020-2021)
  • Toyota RAV4 and RAV4 Hybrid (2020-2021)
  • Toyota Sienna Hybrid (2021)

The issue originates from the Occupant Classification System sensors located in the front passenger seat. These sensors play a pivotal role in the Supplemental Restraint System (SRS), determining the deployment of the front passenger airbag based on the occupant load. A defect has been identified wherein, during production, the sensor’s Printed Circuit Board (PCB) became deformed. This deformation can cause a crack in a capacitor, leading to moisture intrusion over time and resulting in a short circuit.

The malfunctioning of these sensors poses a significant risk. In the event of a short circuit, the SRS warning lamp and the “Passenger Airbag OFF” lamp will illuminate, accompanied by a message on the Multi-Information Display (MID). The most concerning consequence is that the front passenger airbag may not deploy in certain crashes, markedly increasing the risk of injury to the occupant.

To address this issue, Toyota dealers will conduct inspections and replace the sensor where necessary. The recall is comprehensive in its scope, and owner notification letters are expected to be dispatched starting February 4, 2024.

Toyota has assigned the numbers 23TB15/23TA15 for Toyota and 23LB03/23LA03 for Lexus vehicles to this recall. Additionally, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has registered this recall under campaign number 23V-865.

This recall by Toyota highlights the intricate nature of modern automotive safety systems and the critical importance of their proper functioning. Owners of the affected vehicles are urged to heed the recall notice and have their vehicles inspected and repaired as necessary to ensure their safety and that of their passengers.

Volkswagen Charging Cable Could Overheat

Posted on by

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., particularly its Audi division, is facing a significant challenge with its 220V/240V charging cables. Owners of certain 2019-2024 Audi models are being notified due to a defect that could lead to the overheating and potential fire hazard of the outlet or charging cable. This alarming issue affects a range of models, including:

  • 2021-2022 Audi A7
  • 2020-2021 Audi A8
  • 2019-2024 Audi E-Tron
  • 2022-2024 Audi E-Tron GT
  • 2022-2024 Audi Q4 E-Tron
  • 2020-2024 Audi Q5
  • 2022-2024 Audi RS E-Tron GT

The problem first came to light in September 2020 when cases of melting and overheating at the industrial socket (NEMA 14-50) were reported during the use of the industrial 220V/240V plug with 40 amperes. Audi’s thorough investigation, which involved requesting parts from the field and analyzing customer charging behavior, revealed that the vehicles and the provided charging equipment were not at fault. Instead, the cause was often linked to household power outlets and wiring, or circuit breakers not capable of handling the required electrical current.

Understanding that household power outlets and wiring might not be equipped to handle the necessary current, Audi initiated a service campaign that instructed customers to bring their charging equipment to an Audi dealer to modify the charging system control unit to a 50% power level for the industrial plug. Additionally, a warning label was attached to the control unit of the Audi compact charging system, advising on safe usage.

Despite these measures, and the ability to charge at 100% current upon confirmation of adequate home power supply, further incidents of overheating and melting sockets were reported. As a result, in January 2022, Audi launched a safety recall, superseding the service campaign, to replace the affected charging cables with new ones equipped with temperature sensors. For unsold vehicles, the industrial charging cable will be replaced before delivery. As of the latest reports, Audi has identified 615 claims related to this issue from 08/05/2020 to 12/05/2023. Fortunately, there have been no reports of fires, crashes, or injuries connected to this problem.

Audi advises owners of the affected models not to use the 220V/240V compact/portable charging cable. Instead, they should use the 110V home charging cable or public charging stations until the issue is resolved. Owners can expect to receive interim notification letters by February 9, 2024, explaining the safety risks. A second notice will follow, detailing the availability of remedy parts, expected around mid-2024. Audi’s recall numbers are 93U6 and 93U8, with the NHTSA campaign number being 23V-842.

This recall underscores the importance of not only the quality of automotive products but also the compatibility and capacity of home electrical systems. Owners of the affected models are urged to heed the recall notices and take the necessary steps to ensure their safety.

GM Issues Safety Recall for Chevrolet Bolt EVs Due to Seat Belt Pretensioner Fire Risk

Posted on by

Seat belt pretensioner problem Discovery and Investigation of the Defect

The issue was initially brought to GM’s attention on August 29, 2023, by an employee through the company’s Speak Up For Safety (SUFS) program. This action followed a dealer report from Simpson Chevrolet of Irvine, indicating that 66 vehicles repaired under the earlier recall 22V930 had not been properly fixed. Subsequent investigations, initiated by GM on October 10, 2023, uncovered further evidence suggesting Simpson Chevrolet of Irvine’s failure to execute the necessary recall repairs.

Further investigations by GM revealed no direct complaints or incidents linked to this condition. However, the seriousness of the potential risk prompted the GM Safety Field Action Decision Authority (SFADA) to mandate a safety recall for all 22V930 repairs completed by Simpson Chevrolet of Irvine up to December 4, 2023.

Risks Associated with the Defect

The central concern revolves around the seat belt pretensioner. If a crash occurs and the recall remedy has not been implemented, the seat belt pretensioner’s deployment could ignite a fire near the B-pillar, elevating the risk of injury. After a collision, the pretensioner exhaust may set fire to carpet fibers in this area.

Remedy and Owner Notification

To address this issue, GM dealers will inspect both front seat belt pretensioners. If necessary, they will install metal foil at the carpet near the pretensioner exhaust, and some vehicles may also require a new pretensioner cover. These repairs will be conducted free of charge. GM plans to send owner notification letters by January 29, 2024. Notably, these vehicles had been previously recalled for the same issue under recall number 22V-793, necessitating the implementation of this new remedy. The GM recall number is N232421970, and the NHTSA campaign number is 23-845.

Repeated Repairs and California Lemon Law

The situation with the Chevrolet Bolt EV highlights an important aspect of consumer rights, especially in states like California with robust Lemon Laws. The California Lemon Law provides protection to consumers who have purchased or leased vehicles with warranty defects. If a vehicle requires repeated repairs for the same issue, owners may be entitled to compensation, including a refund or replacement vehicle. This law ensures that manufacturers are held accountable for their vehicles’ reliability and safety, offering peace of mind to consumers facing repeated repair issues.

In conclusion, GM’s steps in recalling and repairing these vehicles underscore the importance of automotive safety and consumer protection. Vehicle owners are advised to heed recall notices and ensure their vehicles receive the necessary repairs to mitigate any risks associated with this defect.

Honda’s CR-V Hybrid Battery Cable Safety Issue

Posted on by

Honda has announced a safety recall for certain 2020-2022 CR-V Hybrid vehicles due to a critical issue concerning the 12-Volt battery cable. This recall comes after a detailed investigation into the safety of these vehicles, revealing a potential risk that could increase during specific types of crashes.

The identified problem lies in the routing of the 12-Volt battery cable, which is situated outside of the body frame and lacks a fuse on the power circuit. This design flaw could lead to the battery cable short-circuiting or overheating, particularly in the event of a crash impacting the left front fender area. Such a scenario raises significant concerns about the possibility of a fire and the risk of injury to the occupants.

Chronology of Events Leading to the Recall

  • May 17, 2021: The first known incident occurs, where a crash led to a short circuit in the battery cables located in the left front fender.
  • May 19, 2021: Honda receives a report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) about this incident.
  • May 28, 2021: Honda collaborates with the NHTSA to inspect the affected vehicle and analyze the issue.
  • August 18, 2021: After discussing the first incident with NHTSA, Honda initially concludes that there are no high-voltage related issues or similar complaints.
  • September 16, 2021: Honda conducts further tests to analyze the issue.
  • October 21, 2021: Honda’s evaluation suggests that the crash angle in the first incident was a rare occurrence.
  • June 13, 2022: Honda starts implementing a fuse in production models to address this potential issue.
  • August 18, 2022: A second incident under similar circumstances prompts another analysis by Honda.
  • August 29, 2023: Honda receives a warranty claim possibly related to the same issue.
  • October 30, 2023: Honda reassesses its stance on the rarity of such occurrences and the likelihood of future incidents.
  • December 6, 2023: Honda acknowledges a defect related to vehicle safety and decides to initiate a recall.

The Recall Process

Honda, adhering to its commitment to safety and customer satisfaction, has decided to recall the affected vehicles. Registered owners will be notified via mail to bring their vehicles to an authorized Honda dealer. Here, the battery cable will be replaced with an improved part that addresses the identified safety concern. Honda’s internal number for this recall is FGB, and the NHTSA campaign number is 23V-844.

Safety and Customer Support

From August 2019 through December 6, 2023, Honda has recorded two warranty claims related to this issue, with no reports of injuries or fatalities. This proactive recall demonstrates Honda’s dedication to the safety of its customers and its responsiveness to potential safety issues. Vehicle owners are encouraged to respond promptly to the recall notice to ensure their safety and the continued reliability of their vehicles.