Enel X Way USA’s JuiceBox Level 2 residential EV chargersThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched an investigation into potential fire hazards associated with Enel X Way USA’s JuiceBox Level 2 residential EV chargers. Prompted by several complaints received by the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI), this evaluation aims to determine the extent and safety implications of electrical arcing and thermal incidents reported by users of these chargers. This probe focuses on the potential for fire risks arising from electrical malfunctions and the company’s recent operational shutdown announcement.

Summary of Complaints Filed with ODI

ODI has received six Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) concerning alleged incidents involving the JuiceBox Level 2 charger. These complaints raise serious concerns regarding potential fire hazards that may arise while charging electric vehicles at home. The following highlights from the complaints showcase the range of issues reported:

  1. Total Home Loss Due to Explosion: One complaint involves a significant incident where a vehicle owner claims that charging their EV with a JuiceBox led to an explosion in their garage. This catastrophic event resulted in a fire that destroyed the home entirely.
  2. Car Fire in Driveway: Another complaint describes an incident where a vehicle caught fire in the driveway while connected to a JuiceBox charger. The details of this incident underscore concerns about charger reliability and the potential for dangerous outcomes.
  3. Electrical Malfunctions and Circuit Breaker Issues: Four additional complaints describe issues with electrical malfunctions that caused circuit breakers to trip and charging cycles to be disrupted. These electrical disruptions may indicate underlying issues with the chargers’ compatibility or durability under varying conditions.

Enel X Way’s Operational Shutdown and Potential Impact on User Safety

In an unexpected development, Enel X Way North America announced its intention to cease operations in the United States and Canada by October 11, 2024. A notification was sent to JuiceBox owners on October 2, 2024, which was also posted on the company’s website. This cessation of operations could potentially impact several aspects of the product’s performance and user experience:

  • Software and App Support: As Enel X Way discontinues its North American presence, questions remain about the continuity of the charging app and supporting software. Given that many smart chargers rely on connected software for updates and safety monitoring, the lack of support could leave users with outdated or unsupported technology.
  • Customer Support and Warranty Services: The cessation of operations may also impact the company’s ability to provide customer support, particularly regarding ongoing technical issues, troubleshooting, or warranty claims for JuiceBox chargers.

ODI Preliminary Evaluation and Safety Scope

In response to these serious complaints, ODI has opened a Preliminary Evaluation to examine the safety and reliability of JuiceBox Level 2 chargers. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the scope, frequency, and potential hazards associated with these products. The investigation seeks to determine:

  • Risk of Fire and Explosion: By evaluating complaints of thermal events, such as the explosion in the garage and the driveway car fire, ODI aims to understand the risk factors and whether the JuiceBox charger’s design or operational faults are contributing factors.
  • Electrical Stability and Safety Consequences: ODI’s analysis will also delve into the frequency of electrical malfunctions and whether these events pose a risk of property damage, personal injury, or loss of life.
  • Impact of Software and Operational Changes: With the discontinuation of Enel X Way North America’s operations, ODI is concerned about the potential safety implications arising from the lack of app and software support. The investigation will evaluate if and how this operational change might exacerbate existing safety concerns or introduce new risks.

Affected Vehicles and Part Numbers

The ODI investigation includes a review of incidents involving various EV models that utilized the JuiceBox Level 2 charger. The vehicles associated with these complaints include:

  • Chevrolet Bolt EV (2018)
  • Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid (2018)
  • Hyundai Ioniq 5 (2022)
  • Hyundai Ioniq 6 (2023)

Additionally, the specific product part under scrutiny is the Enel X JuiceBox Level 2 Charger.

Steps for Consumers and Further Information

For EV owners who currently use the JuiceBox Level 2 charger, awareness of this investigation is crucial. Users are encouraged to follow any guidance issued by the NHTSA and consider consulting with licensed electricians to ensure proper installation and safe operation of their EV chargers.

Certain Porsche Taycan models from 2021 to 2024 may face issues with their high-voltage batteries, specifically the potential for short circuits within the battery modules. These short circuits could result in thermal events, including the risk of overheating or even fires in extreme cases. The root cause of this issue has been traced back to potential manufacturing problems from the battery supplier, which, in rare instances, increase the likelihood of internal short circuits.

This latest recall builds on earlier recalls that were issued for similar battery-related problems, namely 23V-840 (manufacturer recall code APB5), 24V-215 (code ARA4), and 24V-217 (code ARA5). Porsche has been using data analytics and conducting hardware tests to better understand the extent of the issue. On September 23, 2024, the company determined that additional Taycan vehicles might be at risk due to potential battery defects, even though no confirmed data anomalies have been identified in these vehicles so far. As a result, Porsche launched a new recall with the identification codes ARB6 and ARB7.

Breakdown of ARB6 and ARB7 Recalls

  • ARB6: This recall covers a group of vehicles for which Porsche does not have enough data to determine whether there are issues with the high-voltage batteries. Since there isn’t sufficient information, Porsche is taking precautionary measures. Owners of vehicles in this group will receive a notification advising them to limit their battery’s charging capacity to a maximum of 80%. This is intended as a temporary solution while further analysis is conducted to either confirm the presence of battery anomalies or clear the vehicle of any issues. This interim step is designed to reduce the risk of thermal events while Porsche continues its investigation.
  • ARB7: In contrast, ARB7 applies to a set of vehicles for which Porsche has gathered sufficient battery data, and current diagnostics show no data anomalies in the high-voltage battery. As a result, there is no need to restrict battery charging for these vehicles to 80%. What sets this group apart is that these vehicles allow Porsche to continuously monitor the battery health via over-the-air updates. This real-time data monitoring enables Porsche to detect any future battery module issues quickly. If an anomaly is detected later, Porsche will notify owners, replace the affected battery module, and advise them to limit charging to 80% until the replacement is completed.

As part of this recall process, Porsche is implementing a series of steps to address the potential battery issues:

  • For ARB6 Vehicles: Owners are advised to cap their battery charging at 80% until a more permanent solution is available. This is purely a precautionary measure while Porsche continues to analyze the vehicles and gather more data on the potential risks.
  • For ARB7 Vehicles: Since Porsche already has access to these vehicles’ battery data via over-the-air diagnostics, there is no need for an 80% charging limit unless future data shows a problem. Porsche’s real-time monitoring will automatically detect any battery module anomalies. Should a problem arise, the company will issue a notification to the owner, and the affected battery modules will be replaced. In the meantime, Porsche will advise affected owners to limit charging to 80% as a safeguard.

For both ARB6 and ARB7, the final remedy will involve installing an advanced on-board diagnostic software on all affected vehicles. This software will be capable of detecting potential battery anomalies before they become serious. However, before this software is installed, Porsche will conduct an analysis of the battery modules in each vehicle. If the analysis shows that no problems are present, the software will be installed immediately. If the analysis detects any issues, Porsche will replace the faulty battery module(s) before proceeding with the installation of the diagnostic software.

Once the new on-board diagnostic software is installed, it will continuously monitor the vehicle’s high-voltage battery using advanced data analytics. If the software detects an anomaly in any of the battery modules, it will send a warning message to the vehicle’s head unit, alerting the driver. In this case, the battery’s charging capacity will be automatically limited in stages: first to 80%, and eventually to a lower limit, likely around 50%, depending on the severity of the detected anomaly. This stepwise reduction in charging capacity helps prevent thermal events and gives the driver time to seek service. If necessary, Porsche will replace the affected battery modules to restore the vehicle’s full functionality. Since the battery consists of multiple modules, it is possible that different modules could show issues at different times, requiring multiple replacements over the vehicle’s lifetime.

Porsche plans to roll out this advanced diagnostic software as the final remedy in the first quarter of 2025. In the meantime, dealers will be prepared to install interim software and address any battery concerns as they arise. Owners of affected vehicles will receive notification letters starting on November 29, 2024. These letters will provide detailed instructions on what steps to take next and how to proceed with repairs or updates.

The recall numbers for this issue are ARB6 and ARB7. Additionally, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has assigned campaign numbers 24V-731 and 24V-732 to these recalls. These recalls build on and replace the earlier recalls 23V-840, 24V-215, and 24V-217, expanding the affected vehicle population as Porsche continues its investigation.

Nissan Leaf Smoking BatteryCertain 2019-2020 Nissan Leaf vehicles, specifically those equipped with quick charge ports for Level 3 charging using the CHAdeMO connector, are facing a potential issue where the battery could overheat during quick charging. This issue is serious, as it significantly raises the risk of a vehicle fire, which could lead to injury or property damage. The affected LEAF models were produced at Nissan’s Smyrna, Tennessee plant between August 29, 2018, and November 3, 2020. Nissan has identified this issue through their production records, confirming that it is limited to these specific Model Year 2019-2020 LEAF vehicles. Importantly, no other Nissan or INFINITI vehicles are known to be impacted by this defect, offering some reassurance to owners of other Nissan models.

Nissan is actively investigating the cause of this issue. Preliminary findings suggest that the problem stems from excessive lithium deposits forming inside the lithium-ion battery cells of these vehicles. These deposits increase the electrical resistance within the battery, which can cause fluctuations in the battery’s state of charge. This elevated resistance becomes particularly problematic during Level 3 quick charging, as it may result in the battery heating up more rapidly than intended. If the charging session continues under these conditions, the risk of a battery fire is significantly heightened, posing a serious safety concern.

Drivers may notice several warning signs during Level 3 charging that indicate something is wrong. These include the presence of smoke, unusual noises, interrupted charging sessions, or strange thermal odors emanating from the vehicle’s battery compartment. If any of these signs are observed, Nissan strongly advises stopping the charging process immediately and avoiding Level 3 charging altogether until the problem can be resolved.

Nissan is developing a solution for this issue in the form of a software update for the affected vehicles. Once available, this software update will be installed by dealers and is designed to correct the problem by managing the battery’s charging process more effectively. Nissan is taking steps to notify affected vehicle owners. Interim letters, alerting them to the safety risk, are expected to be mailed in October 2024. A second notice will follow once the software remedy is ready for deployment.

Until the fix is in place, Nissan advises owners to avoid using Level 3 quick charging stations and instead rely on slower charging methods, which do not present the same risk. For those affected, Nissan’s recall number is R24B2, and the corresponding NHTSA campaign number is 24V-700.

Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (Jaguar) are reaching out to the owners of specific 2019 Jaguar I-PACE vehicles regarding a significant safety concern involving the high-voltage battery. The issue, which could potentially cause the battery to overheat, has prompted a recall to ensure the safety of the vehicle owners.

This recall comes after a series of events beginning in July 2024, when Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group identified a problem related to a warranty report. The issue involved a fuel injector with a missing o-ring support disc, which could lead to fuel system malfunctions. Ford’s Supplier Technical Assistance team, in collaboration with the supplier, conducted an in-depth review of images taken during the production of all fuel injectors to pinpoint the parts that could be affected. They then compared these findings to vehicle production records to identify the specific vehicles at risk.

On August 16, 2024, Ford’s Field Review Committee evaluated the concern and decided to approve a field action to address the problem. Up to that date, Ford had identified 10 reports of vehicles with fuel injectors missing the crucial o-ring support disc. Fortunately, there have been no reports of fires, accidents, or injuries related to this condition. However, the potential risk was significant enough to warrant immediate action.

Jaguar is advising all affected vehicle owners to take precautionary measures until the recall repair is completed. Specifically, owners are urged to park and charge their vehicles outdoors and away from any structures. This precaution should continue for 30 days even after the repair has been completed, ensuring the safety of both the owners and their surroundings.

As an interim solution, Jaguar dealerships will update the software of the battery energy control module to help mitigate the risk. However, the final, long-term remedy for the issue is still being developed. Jaguar plans to send out official owner notification letters by October 18, 2024, providing detailed instructions on the next steps. For reference, Jaguar has assigned the recall number H514, and it has been registered with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) under the campaign number 24V-633.

It’s important to note that this isn’t the first recall related to this issue. The same vehicles were previously recalled under multiple recall numbers, including 24V-085 (H471), 23V-709 (H459), and 23V-369 (H441). If you own one of these vehicles, you will need to have the latest remedy performed, even if your vehicle has already undergone previous repairs for this issue.

In April 2024, Hyundai became aware of a significant safety issue involving the main floor wiring harness in certain 2024 Hyundai Santa Fe and Santa Fe Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) models. This issue was first identified following reports of an inadvertent rear seat side airbag deployment in a Santa Fe vehicle in South Korea. As a result, Hyundai initiated a preliminary investigation, which was subsequently extended to include the North American market.

The defect centers on the main floor wire harness, which in the affected vehicles is susceptible to damage due to contact with the passenger-side, second-row bench seat’s folding hinge assembly. This contact can result in the wire harness becoming chafed, leading to several potential hazards:

  • Illumination of the Air Bag Warning Light: A damaged wire harness can trigger the air bag warning light on the vehicle’s dashboard, indicating a malfunction.
  • Inadvertent Air Bag Deployment: The damage can cause the airbags to deploy unintentionally, posing a significant risk to vehicle occupants.
  • Failure to Deploy Air Bags During a Crash: Conversely, the damage could also prevent the airbags from deploying in the event of a crash, reducing the effectiveness of this critical safety feature.

Hyundai’s investigation revealed eight unique incidents related to this defect in the U.S. market. These findings prompted the company to take immediate action to address the issue and ensure the safety of its customers.

Hyundai will notify affected vehicle owners via first-class mail, instructing them to bring their vehicles to an authorized Hyundai dealer for inspection and repair. The repair process will involve:

  1. Inspection of the Wire Harness: Dealers will check the condition of the main floor wire harness for any signs of damage.
  2. Securing the Wire Harness: If no damage is found, the harness will be properly secured to prevent future contact with the seat’s folding hinge assembly.
  3. Replacement of Damaged Wire Harness: If damage is detected, the wire harness will be replaced with a new one to ensure the vehicle’s safety systems function correctly.


As a precaution, Hyundai advises vehicle owners to be vigilant for any of the warning symptoms mentioned in the defect report, such as the air bag warning light illuminating. If any of these symptoms are present, owners are urged to immediately go for diagnosis and the necessary repairs.

Owner notification letters are scheduled to be mailed out on September 23, 2024. Hyundai has assigned the internal recall number 265 to this campaign, while the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has designated it as campaign number 24V-561.

Chrysler Pacifica Battery FireChrysler (FCA US, LLC) has found a problem with some 2019-2021 Pacifica Plug-In Hybrid Electric (PHEV) vehicles, as well as some 2017-2018 Pacifica PHEVs that got a software update under a previous recall (NHTSA recall number 22V-077). The issue is with the battery pack, which could cause a fire even when the car is parked and the ignition is off.

Chrysler first learned about this issue in February 2022 through the Vehicle Regulations Committee, which led them to start a voluntary safety recall on certain Pacifica PHEVs, known as recall Z11.

Since then, Chrysler and LG Energy Solution (LGES) have been working to figure out the root cause of the problem. They’ve analyzed field reports, bought back vehicles, looked at vehicle data, conducted thermal tests, and torn down battery packs to get to the bottom of it.

In November 2022, the Technical Safety and Regulatory Compliance (TSRC) team at Chrysler was informed about a battery fire in a Pacifica PHEV that had already been fixed under recall Z11.

From June 2023 to December 2023, TSRC learned about five more fires involving the HV battery in some Pacifica PHEVs that had the Z11 remedy. They tried to buy back these vehicles to analyze if the recall fix was working.

In April 2024, Chrysler received a Pacifica PHEV with a post-Z11 remedy fire in the battery pack. After analyzing the vehicle and battery pack, they sent the battery back to the supplier for further inspection. They found a torn anode tab in one of the cells, but couldn’t identify a second factor causing the fires. This confirmed that the Z11 remedy wasn’t effective.

A folded or torn anode tab can lead to lithium by-product build-up over time. This defect, combined with another unknown factor, can cause an internal short in the battery pack, potentially resulting in a vehicle fire.

Chrysler advises owners not to charge their vehicles and to park them outside and away from structures until repairs are made. Dealers will update the high voltage battery pack control module (BPCM) software, and if necessary, replace the battery pack assembly. The recall numbers are 72B and 73B, and the NHTSA campaign numbers are 24V-356 and 24V-358. Vehicles previously repaired under recall 22V-077 will need to have the new fix applied.

The Volkswagen ID.4 SUV represents the German automaker’s entrance into the growing electric vehicle (EV) market. Launched with the promise of combining the brand’s legendary driving dynamics with cutting-edge EV technology, the ID.4 aims to provide a sustainable yet practical driving experience. However, as with many new models, especially those pioneering new technologies, the ID.4 has faced its share of teething troubles. This article will delve into the common problems reported by ID.4 owners and explain how these issues could potentially classify your vehicle as a lemon under the California Lemon Law. We’ll also highlight the importance of seeking assistance from a lemon law attorney if you find yourself grappling with persistent vehicle issues.

Common Volkswagen ID.4 Problems

1. Charging Issues

Many ID.4 owners have reported difficulties with charging their vehicles. Problems range from slow charging speeds to the car not charging at all. Some users have encountered issues with the compatibility of their ID.4 with various public charging stations, leading to inconvenience and frustration.

2. Software Glitches

The ID.4’s infotainment system and other software-driven features have been a source of concern for some drivers. Complaints include unresponsive touchscreens, malfunctioning navigation systems, and intermittent connectivity issues with smartphones. These software bugs can detract from the overall user experience and disrupt daily usage.

3. Battery Performance

Some ID.4 owners have reported inconsistent battery performance, including unexpected drops in range and inaccurate range estimates. Such issues can severely impact the reliability of the vehicle, especially for long-distance travel.

4. Build Quality

Although Volkswagen is renowned for its build quality, some ID.4 owners have experienced issues with fit and finish. Reports include problems with door alignment, rattling noises from the cabin, and malfunctioning interior components. These issues, while sometimes minor, can affect overall satisfaction with the vehicle.

5. Electrical System Faults

Electrical system faults have also been reported, with owners experiencing warning lights and system errors. These faults can be unsettling and sometimes necessitate multiple visits to the dealership for resolution.

When Is Your Vehicle a Lemon?

A vehicle is generally considered a “lemon” if it has significant defects that affect its use, value, or safety, and these defects persist despite multiple repair attempts. Under California law, a vehicle is presumed to be a lemon if:

  • The manufacturer has made at least two attempts to repair a warranty problem that could result in death or serious injury if the vehicle is driven.
  • The manufacturer has made at least four attempts to fix the same warranty problem.
  • The vehicle has been out of service for more than 30 days (not necessarily consecutive) for warranty issues.

Understanding the California Lemon Law

The California Lemon Law, officially known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, provides robust protections for consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles. The law mandates that if a manufacturer cannot repair a vehicle to conform to its warranty after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer must either replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price, minus a usage fee.

Benefits of the California Lemon Law

  1. Consumer Protection: The law protects consumers from being stuck with a defective vehicle.
  2. Replacement or Refund: Consumers are entitled to a replacement vehicle or a refund, ensuring they receive the value they paid for.
  3. Legal Support: Consumers can recover legal fees if they prevail in a lemon law claim, making it financially feasible to pursue legitimate claims.

The Importance of a Lemon Law Attorney

Navigating the intricacies of the California Lemon Law can be challenging, and manufacturers often have significant legal resources at their disposal. Here’s why hiring a lemon law attorney is a smart move:

  1. Expertise: Lemon law attorneys have specialized knowledge of consumer protection laws and can effectively navigate the legal process.
  2. Maximized Compensation: An attorney can help ensure you receive the maximum compensation you are entitled to, including potential incidental and consequential damages.
  3. No Upfront Costs: Many lemon law attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they only get paid if you win your case.

Conclusion

The Volkswagen ID.4 SUV, while a promising entry into the electric vehicle market, has faced several common problems reported by owners. If you find yourself repeatedly dealing with these issues, your vehicle might qualify as a lemon under the California Lemon Law. Seeking the assistance of a lemon law attorney can provide the expertise and support needed to navigate this legal landscape and ensure you receive fair treatment. Remember, consumer protection laws are there to safeguard your rights and ensure you get the quality you paid for in your vehicle purchase.

2022 Kia Niro EV ChargingKia has identified a potential safety issue with certain 2022 Kia Niro Electric Vehicle (EV) models. The problem affects the high-voltage battery safety plug, which may overheat and melt due to electrical resistance.

What Happened?

The issue came to light in July 2023 when a dealer reported a case involving a 2022 Niro EV that shut off while driving without entering “Ready” mode. Further investigation revealed an isolated melted safety plug. Kia’s Safety Office monitored the issue and found no other incidents except for one isolated case.

What Did Kia Find?

Kia’s Safety Office conducted field data analysis and discovered that the melted safety plug was caused by high temperatures, not any issues with the battery cells or temperature sensors. The investigation also revealed a manufacturing process deviation in the supplier’s Female-Female terminal, which affected specific vehicle production lots.

Recall Alert

As a result of the findings, Kia has issued a recall for certain 2022 model year Niro EV vehicles due to the potential safety risk posed by the faulty safety plugs. The recall was announced on May 15, 2024.

Symptoms and Risks

If the electrical resistance in the safety plug occurs while driving or during battery charging, it may melt, increasing the risk of:

  • Loss of motive power
  • Fire

Drivers may notice an illuminated EV Service Warning light and/or a burning smell (melting plastics and smoke).

What to Do?

Owners with affected vehicles are advised not to charge their vehicle in a garage or any other covered structure until the recall repair is completed. Dealers will replace the safety plug, and owner notification letters are expected to be mailed on July 19, 2024.

Kia Recall Information

  • Kia’s number for this recall: SC314
  • NHTSA campaign number: 24V-358