Automotive News « California Lemon Law blog

A shocking number of complaints has prompted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to launch a safety probe into engine failure reports affecting approximately 870,000 Chevrolet, GMC, and Cadillac models manufactured by General Motors (GM). The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a staggering 39 complaints, accompanied by numerous Early Warning Reporting (EWR) Field Reports, all pointing to engine failure in vehicles equipped with the L87 V8 engine.

Which Vehicles Are Affected?

The following models are under scrutiny:

2019-2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2019-2024 GMC Sierra 1500
2021-2024 Chevrolet Tahoe
2021-2024 Chevrolet Suburban
2021-2024 GMC Yukon
2021-2024 Cadillac Escalade

The Alarming Reality of Engine Failure

Complainants have reported a disturbing trend: a bearing failure can trigger either engine seizure or a catastrophic breach of the engine block by the connecting rod. In many cases, there are no warning signs before the failure occurs, resulting in a sudden and unexpected loss of power. This increases the risk of a crash, which can lead to devastating consequences, including injuries and property damage.

NHTSA Takes Action

In response to these disturbing reports, the ODI has initiated a Preliminary Evaluation (PE) to determine the scope and severity of the potential problem. The investigation aims to assess the safety-related issues associated with engine failure and identify any necessary corrective actions to prevent future incidents.

What California Drivers Need to Know

If you’re behind the wheel of one of these affected vehicles, it’s crucial to be aware of this potential issue. Engine failure can be a significant safety concern, especially when driving at high speeds. Don’t wait until it’s too late – stay informed and take proactive steps to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Seeking Help from a California Lemon Law Expert

If you’re experiencing engine problems or other issues with your Chevy, GMC, or Cadillac vehicle, don’t hesitate to reach out to our experienced California Lemon Law attorneys. Our team is dedicated to helping you navigate the complex process and determine if you’re eligible for compensation or relief under the law. If you have concerns about your vehicle or would like to report an incident, consult with a California Lemon Law attorney for expert guidance and support.

For decades, the California Lemon Law has been the legal sword available to consumers gifting them needed legal power against auto manufacturers. The lemon law in California is also generous to consumers providing them with a provision which places the obligation upon the manufacturer to pay the consumer’s legal fees and costs.

Up until Covid, very few law firms specialized in the lemon law, with Edzant Price, LLP being one of the few. The relationship between these few law firms and the auto manufacturers was cooperative, with most law firms presenting to the manufacturers cases which were generally strong. Prior to filing a lawsuit, or “pre-litigation,” most firms also provided manufacturers an opportunity to repurchase or replace the defective vehicle, which was often accepted. As such, filing lawsuits in lemon law cases was usually unnecessary as most cases were resolved during pre-litigation. The average pre-litigation case was completed within 90 days. The manufacturer paid the legal fees for the consumer based upon the time it took the law firm to resolve the case pre-litigation.

However, post Covid, several new law firms entered into the lemon law arena and adopted an aggressive, and unnecessary, tactic to pursue these claims wherein they did not give a manufacturer the opportunity to repurchase a vehicle pre-litigation. Instead, these firms would file lawsuits against the manufacturers immediately, thereby forcing a case into litigation. (Many of these cases were also weak and should not have been accepted by any law firm.) So why would they do this? Because of the obligation imposed upon the manufacturer to pay the legal fees for the consumer. In litigation, the amount of time to pursue a lemon law case is substantially higher than resolving a case pre-litigation, allowing the law firms to bill manufacturers much higher legal fees. There is no benefit to the consumer.

Furthermore, the amount of cases filed by these firms was staggering, with court filings amounting to thousands of new cases per month. As predicted, the courts were unable to manage this massive influx of filings, taxing the civil justice system to a breaking point. In addition, the manufacturers had to spend tens of millions of unnecessary dollars defending these lawsuits. Instead of 90 days to complete a case, an average case was now taking one to two years to conclude. Simply put, the system had become horribly abused, creating a substantial burden upon the courts, the auto manufacturers, and attorneys. The system was now broken and had to be corrected.

To curb this lawsuit abuse, the California legislature created a condition that anyone seeking to bring a lemon law case must first give the manufacturer the opportunity to repurchase or replace a qualified vehicle prior to filing a lawsuit. (There are some exceptions.) This prerequisite to filing a lawsuit is designed to significantly reduce the number of lawsuits being filed daily and to curb the abuse of the civil justice system. Most importantly, this law change is designed to provide consumers of defective vehicles a quicker and smoother pathway to resolve their legitimate lemon law claims.

Edzant Price LLP advocates that all lemon law cases should try to be resolved prior to filing lawsuits. For over 35 years, we have always given the manufacturers the opportunity to repurchase or replace a vehicle prior to filing lawsuits. We believe this method of presenting lemon law cases help consumers get out of defective vehicles quickly and is also fair to auto manufacturers. Additionally, we only accept and pursue cases which have merit. Because of the way we pursue our cases, manufacturers treat Edzant Price, LLP with the utmost respect and know that when our name is on the case, the case should be taken seriously.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has launched an investigation into certain Ford Bronco and Maverick vehicles due to concerns with their electrical systems. The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened a Preliminary Evaluation in January 2024 to investigate allegations of loss of motive power in model year 2021 Ford Bronco Sport vehicles.

What’s Happening?

In April 2024, Ford issued a safety recall (24V-267) covering 456,565 model year 2021-2024 Ford Bronco Sport and model year 2022-2023 Ford Maverick vehicles. The recall addressed occurrences of loss of motive power resulting from sudden degradation of the 12V battery during the drive cycle. When the battery failure occurs, consumers may experience a complete loss of engine power without the ability to restart, accompanied by the loss of 12V accessories, including hazard lights.

The Remedy

The recall remedy consists of software updates to the body control module and powertrain control module, which were designed to provide improved detection of the 12V battery state of charge during the drive cycle and provide warning to consumers if the battery is degraded.

New Concerns Arise

Despite the recall, the ODI has since received 15 reports from vehicle owners describing loss of motive power incidents for model year 2021 Ford Bronco Sport vehicles that received the 24V-267 recall remedy. Consumers describe that prior to the loss of motive power, there were no warnings related to the 12V battery or vehicle electrical system. Additionally, multiple consumers reported that after the vehicle was towed to the dealership following the loss of motive power, the event was diagnosed to the 12V battery, and a battery replacement was the only required repair.

What’s Being Done About It?

The NHTSA has opened an investigation (RQ24014) to further examine this issue. The agency will review the data and determine if additional action is necessary to ensure public safety.

What to Do Next

If you own one of these vehicles and have experienced a loss of motive power, it’s crucial to:

File a report : Share your experience with the NHTSA by submitting a complaint on their website.
Stay informed : Keep an eye on this investigation and any updates from the manufacturer or the NHTSA.

Your safety is paramount, and staying proactive can help prevent potential electrical system failures and keep you safe on the road.

Key Facts

Affected Vehicles: Certain Ford Bronco and Maverick models (2021-2024 Ford Bronco Sport and 2022-2023 Ford Maverick)
Component: Electrical System
NHTSA Action Number: RQ24014
Opened From: November 15, 2024–Present

The Hyundai Santa Fe is a popular choice for families and adventurers alike, known for its spacious design, modern features, and reasonable price point. However, recent models (2021-2024) have experienced a series of issues that have frustrated owners and raised safety concerns. These common problems affect Santa Fe vehicles with GDI engines.

Common Issues Affecting the 2021-2024 Hyundai Santa Fe

Fuel Injector Problems Leading to Stalling
A major concern for many Santa Fe owners is the vehicle’s fuel injector system. Faulty fuel injectors can cause the engine to stall unexpectedly, especially in models with GDI (Gasoline Direct Injection) engines. These issues have led to numerous complaints of the vehicle stalling while driving, creating hazardous situations on busy roads.
Loss of Power
Some owners report a sudden loss of power while driving, particularly when accelerating or maintaining speed on the highway. This loss of power can be alarming and dangerous, especially in situations where acceleration is necessary, such as merging or overtaking. Many drivers have reported that their Santa Fe either stalls entirely or hesitates significantly before regaining power, often triggering check engine or warning lights.
Persistent Check Engine Light
For Santa Fe models across 2021-2024, the check engine light has become a frequent visitor. Many owners report that the light comes on without clear resolution, even after multiple trips to the dealership. While the check engine light could signify any number of issues, the combination of repeated lights and related powertrain issues has led to frustration and concerns about reliability.

Complaints and Recalls for Each Model Year

2021 Hyundai Santa Fe

Owners of the 2021 model have raised concerns about fuel system problems, including fuel leaks at the pipe connection and improperly tightened fuel pipes. Powertrain complaints are also prevalent, with owners describing issues such as failure to accelerate and hesitation while driving. Recalls include:

Tow Hitch Harness Fire Hazard: Due to water accumulation, an electrical short could lead to a fire.
Loss of Drive Power: A transmission oil pump malfunction can cause total power loss.
Inadequate Windshield Bonding: Improper bonding during manufacturing may cause the windshield to detach in a crash.

2022 Hyundai Santa Fe

The 2022 Santa Fe has seen similar powertrain issues, with some owners reporting a sudden inability to accelerate and warning lights like “Check Hybrid System.” The “phantom braking” issue has also emerged, where the emergency braking system activates without reason, nearly causing accidents. Recalls for the 2022 model include:

Tow Hitch Harness Fire Hazard
Loss of Drive Power
Turbocharger Oil Supply Pipe Leak: A cracked oil supply pipe could lead to leaks in the engine compartment.

2023 Hyundai Santa Fe PHEV

In the 2023 plug-in hybrid models, forward collision avoidance issues have led to abrupt braking in traffic. Complaints also include poor acceleration response, with significant delay or lag from the time the accelerator is pressed to when the vehicle actually moves. Key recalls include:

Tow Hitch Harness Fire Hazard
Seat Belt Pretensioners May Explode: This recall affects the front seat belt pretensioners, which may explode upon deployment in a crash.

2024 Hyundai Santa Fe

For the latest 2024 model, powertrain and electrical issues are significant. Some drivers report the vehicle losing motive power and experiencing flickering dashboard screens. Complaints include blacked-out instrument panels, “Transmission System Check” warnings, and persistent audio issues that continue even when the vehicle is off. Recalls for this model include:

Unintentional Airbag Deployment or Deactivation: Damaged wiring harnesses can lead to unintended airbag activation or deactivation.
Vehicle Roll Away from Software Error: A transmission software error may result in a roll-away when the vehicle is parked.
Obstructed Rear-View Camera Image: A trailer parking assist message may obstruct the rear-view camera, violating rear visibility standards.

Should You Be Concerned?

These issues have led to frustration for many Hyundai Santa Fe owners. If you’re experiencing any of the above problems, it’s essential to address them promptly for your safety. Keep an eye out for any recalls or technical service bulletins (TSBs) from Hyundai, and report any persistent issues to your dealer.

What’s Next?

The 2021-2024 Hyundai Santa Fe offers many attractive features but has also faced considerable challenges, particularly with its powertrain and fuel injector systems. If you’re dealing with ongoing issues, it’s crucial to know your rights, especially if repairs have been ineffective. Lemon laws may protect you if your vehicle has recurring problems that affect its performance or safety. Consider consulting with a lemon law professional to discuss options if repairs haven’t resolved the issue.

Owning a car should be about convenience and freedom – not worry over performance and safety. If you’re having trouble with your Santa Fe, stay informed, stay safe, and know your options.

Hyundai Motor America (HMC) is reaching out to owners of specific Genesis G70, G80, and G90 vehicles equipped with a 3.3-liter V6 turbocharged engine about a crucial safety concern. This issue involves the oil feed pipe that could potentially deteriorate and lead to oil leakage, posing a risk of engine compartment fires.

What’s the Problem?

The defect lies in the left hand (LH) turbocharger oil supply pipe within these vehicles. Prolonged exposure to high temperatures in the engine compartment can cause this pipe to crack, potentially resulting in oil leaks onto the exhaust manifold. Such leaks significantly increase the risk of engine compartment fires.

Investigation and Decision to Recall

HMC initiated an investigation into this issue in June 2023 after reports of similar incidents in foreign markets. The Data Review Committee (DRC) noted a concerning trend of turbocharger oil supply pipe repairs during colder seasons. After escalating the investigation to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) in February 2024, HMC confirmed the need for a safety recall.

The TRC observed repeat repairs related to a prior recall (Recall 003G – 19V-538) addressing oil leak issues caused by insufficient swaging of the turbocharger oil supply pipe fitting. The affected vehicles, including those addressed in the previous recall, were manufactured before a material change to stainless steel pipes was implemented by the supplier around August 2021.

Affected Vehicles and Reports

The recall affects approximately:

14,186 model year 2019-2022 Genesis G70 vehicles
7,372 model year 2018-2020 Genesis G80 vehicles
6,881 model year 2017-2022 Genesis G90 vehicles

As of January 15, 2024, HMC has received 81 reports alleging the defect in the U.S. market. However, no confirmed crashes, injuries, or fires related to this issue have been reported.

Signs of Trouble

Owners should remain vigilant for signs indicating a potential problem with the oil feed pipe, including:

White smoke
Burning smell
Oil leaking onto ground surfaces

What Next?

All affected vehicle owners will receive notification by first-class mail, providing instructions to visit a Genesis retailer for replacement of the LH turbocharger oil supply pipe. The recall number assigned to this issue is 019G. The NHTSA campaign number is 24V-191, replacing the previous recall number 19V-538. Vehicles previously serviced under recall 19V-538 will require another repair.

The Jeep Wrangler 4XE plug-in hybrid has faced a series of challenges that have left many owners questioning the reliability of their vehicles. Reports from owners highlight a range of issues, from stalling engines that cannot be restarted to transmission errors, battery defects, and more serious safety concerns.

One common complaint among Wrangler 4XE owners is the vehicle’s tendency to stall unexpectedly, leaving drivers unable to restart the car. This issue is not just inconvenient but poses a significant safety risk, especially if it occurs in traffic or remote areas. Additionally, there have been reports of defective batteries and blown fuses, further contributing to the vehicle’s unreliability.

Transmission problems are another significant issue, with some owners experiencing leaks and errors, alongside instances where the shifter becomes stuck in park, rendering the vehicle immobile. Warning lights, such as the check engine light and power steering light, frequently accompany these mechanical failures, along with messages indicating the need to “Service Electronic Stability.”

Charging issues have also been a point of frustration. Errors like “Service Charging System” have been reported, alongside malfunctions in the Power Inverter Module (PIM), further complicating the ownership experience. In some cases, these electrical issues lead to a complete loss of power, preventing the vehicle from starting.

More alarming are reports of oil leaks from the exhaust and rear undercarriage, with one vehicle diagnosed with a bad pinion seal on the rear axle at merely 241 miles on the odometer. The recurrence of such leaks, accompanied by smoke and the potential risk of fire, underscores the severity of the Wrangler 4XE’s problems.

The erratic behavior of the vehicle’s transmission and propulsion systems, including sudden stops in the middle of highways and unintended acceleration that has led to property damage, raises significant concerns about the safety and reliability of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE.

For owners facing these daunting issues, California’s Lemon Law provides a beacon of hope. This law is designed to protect consumers who have purchased or leased new vehicles covered by a manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty. If a vehicle proves to be defective and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer is required to either replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price to the consumer.

Under the California Lemon Law, owners of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE experiencing repeated failures that substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety may be entitled to relief. It’s essential for affected owners to keep detailed records of all repairs and attempts made to address the issues, as these documents will be crucial in pursuing a lemon law claim.

The myriad of problems faced by Jeep Wrangler 4XE owners highlights the challenges in the automotive industry’s shift towards electrification, especially in models that are expected to perform under the demanding conditions for which Jeeps are renowned. For those grappling with these defects, understanding and utilizing the protections offered by the Lemon Law can provide a pathway to resolution and ensure that manufacturers are held accountable for the reliability and safety of their vehicles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has recently issued a cautionary statement regarding the use of aftermarket steering wheel decals. They are alerting vehicle owners to the potential safety risks associated with these popular accessories. This advisory, while not directly related to Lemon Law issues, underscores the importance of prioritizing safety in vehicle modifications.

The NHTSA’s Concern

The center of NHTSA’s advisory lies in the potential hazards that steering wheel decals pose. Often crafted from materials such as vinyl or plastic, these decorative additions can interfere with the steering system’s safety features, particularly airbags and control buttons. In extreme scenarios, such interference might hinder airbag deployment in accidents, elevating the risk of driver injury.

A Safety Perspective

The NHTSA’s warning provides an essential distinction between manufacturer defects covered under Lemon Laws and aftermarket modifications made by vehicle owners. Lemon Laws are designed to protect consumers from manufacturer-related issues, but do not extend to aftermarket alterations like steering wheel decals. This distinction is critical as it places the responsibility for any resulting safety issues on the owner post-modification.

Safety Risks of Steering Wheel Decals

While steering wheel decals might appear to be a simple cosmetic enhancement, they can inadvertently impact a vehicle’s safety. These decals can obscure important warning labels or indicators, potentially causing confusion. Additionally, they may alter the feel and function of control buttons, leading to distraction or delayed reactions from the driver in crucial moments.

Manufacturer Warnings and Warranty Concerns

Vehicle manufacturers often advise against modifications that could affect safety feature functionality. Installing aftermarket steering wheel decals could lead to warranty voidance, particularly if these modifications contribute to any system malfunctions or failures. Vehicle owners should consider this potential impact on their warranty coverage before proceeding with such modifications.

Making Informed Choices: Safety vs. Aesthetics

NHTSA encourages vehicle owners to consider safety implications ahead of aesthetic preferences when modifying their vehicles. For those still looking to customize their steering wheels, there are safer alternatives. Options like custom stitching or accessories approved by the manufacturer can provide personalization without sacrificing safety.

Prioritizing Safety in Vehicle Customization

To sum up, while aftermarket steering wheel decals are not a Lemon Law matter, their influence on vehicle safety cannot be overlooked. The NHTSA’s warning is a vital reminder for consumers to carefully consider the safety implications of any vehicle customization. Remember, when it comes to modifying your vehicle, ensuring that aesthetics do not compromise safety is crucial. In the realm of vehicle customization, it’s always better to err on the side of caution.

Automobile Rebuild Tites

Vehicles with rebuilt titles in the United States represent a unique category in the automotive market. Understanding what a rebuilt title is, its implications, and the pros and cons of purchasing such vehicles is crucial for any potential buyer or current owner.

What is a Rebuilt Title?

A rebuilt title is assigned to a vehicle that was previously deemed a total loss by an insurance company due to extensive damage or theft and then repaired to a roadworthy condition. This title indicates that the vehicle has been restored after significant damage.

How a Vehicle Gets a Rebuilt Title

Damage and Insurance Assessment: Initially, a vehicle is given a salvage title when it’s considered a total loss by an insurance company, typically due to severe damage, flood, fire, or theft.
Repair and Restoration: The vehicle is then repaired, often by a private individual or a repair facility.
Inspection: After repairs, the vehicle undergoes a state-mandated inspection to ensure it meets safety standards.
Rebranding as Rebuilt: Once it passes inspection, the vehicle’s title is rebranded from salvage to rebuilt.

Identifying a Vehicle with a Rebuilt Title

The title document itself will clearly state if it is a rebuilt title. Additionally, vehicle history report services can provide this information based on the vehicle identification number (VIN).

Impact on Automobile Insurance

Limited Insurance Options: Many insurers are hesitant to cover rebuilt title cars or offer limited policies excluding collision and comprehensive coverage.
Higher Premiums: Those that do offer full coverage might charge significantly higher premiums due to the perceived higher risk.

Pros and Cons of Buying a Rebuilt Title Vehicle

Pros

Documented Repair Work: Sellers of rebuilt title cars often provide detailed documentation of repairs, offering more insight into the vehicle’s condition than typical used car transactions.
Significant Discounts: These vehicles are generally much cheaper, with potential discounts up to 50% compared to cars with clean titles.

Cons

Safety Risks: There’s an inherent risk in the vehicle’s safety standards, as the extent and quality of repairs can vary.
Limited Insurance Coverage: Difficulty in securing comprehensive insurance coverage is a significant drawback.
Financing Challenges: Most major banks are reluctant to finance vehicles with rebuilt titles.
Voided Warranty: Manufacturer warranties are typically voided once a vehicle is marked as salvage or rebuilt.
Low Resale Value: These vehicles have a lower resale value and may be challenging to sell, as some dealerships avoid buying them.

Owning a vehicle with a rebuilt title can significantly impact the applicability and process of invoking the California Lemon Law. This law is designed to protect consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles with substantial manufacturing defects. However, when it comes to vehicles with rebuilt titles, the situation becomes more complex. Typically, these vehicles are excluded from coverage under the California Lemon Law because they are not new and have been extensively repaired after being deemed a total loss. The law primarily covers vehicles under the original manufacturer’s warranty, which is often voided in the case of a rebuilt title. Additionally, the history of significant damage and subsequent repairs makes it challenging to attribute any new defects directly to the manufacturer’s responsibility, a key criterion under the Lemon Law. As a result, owners of vehicles with rebuilt titles may find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to seek remedy under this law for any issues that arise with their vehicle.

Vehicles with rebuilt titles present a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges. While they offer an affordable option with potentially well-documented repair histories, the drawbacks in terms of safety, insurance, financing, warranty, and resale value are significant. It’s essential for buyers to weigh these factors carefully, conduct thorough research, and consider their willingness to accept the risks associated with a rebuilt title vehicle.

Free Lemon Law Case Review

Category Archives: Automotive News

NHTSA Investigates Engine Failure in GM Trucks And SUVs

2025 Brings Lemon Law Reform Curing Lawsuit Abuse

Electrical System Concerns In Ford Bronco and Maverick Vehicles

2021-2024 Hyundai Santa Fe Problems